Tunis, 13 February 2017 – ASF, the Tunisian National Bar Association (ONAT) and the Tunisian League for Human Rights (LTDH) are calling on the Tunisian authorities to review the 2015 counter-terrorism act. Enforcement of this act raises issues regarding the right to a fair trial. The three partner organisations say that respecting human rights is a democratic state’s main weapon for fighting against terrorism effectively. The counter-terrorism act had been adopted by the Parliament in July 2015, shortly after the bloody attacks on the Bardo National Museum in the Tunisian capital and in Port el-Kantaoui, one of the most important beach resorts in the country. 60 people died in those attacks. Enforcement of this act was analysed in depth by the Observation Network of Transitional Tunisian Justice (ROJ). Created jointly by ASF, ONAT and the LTDH, the ROJ has observed 164 trials relating to terrorism over 232 hearings, which is more than half of the cases relating to terrorism brought before the courts by examining judges since the act came into force. “In practice, we have noticed a great number of failures to uphold the fundamental principles of a fair trial“, says Antonio Manganella, Head of ASF in Tunisia. “As well as recurring judicial malfunction, the anti-terrorism act has brought about major excesses, which have had a perverse effect on the entire penal system“. For example, people can be kept in custody for up to two weeks and can be refused the presence of a lawyer during the first 48 hours of their detention. Reserved only for terrorism cases, these measures “put people at greater risk of ill-treatment“, states Mr Manganella. Data produced from observing the trials have been presented in a report, which also makes recommendations aimed at reconciling the security strategy and respect for human rights. “The most important recommendation to the legislative authority is a review of this act which has been drawn up under political pressure”, stated the Vice-President of the LTDH, Bassem Trifi, to Agence France Presse during the presentation of the report in Tunis at the start of February. ASF and its partners believe that strengthening and protecting human rights, as well as giving primacy to the act, are essential for winning the fight against terrorism. Similarly, the implementation of effective security measures and protection of human rights must be seen as complementary and synergetic objectives, rather than conflicting ones. The report “Lutte contre le terrorisme et pratiques judicaires en Tunisie: le procès équitable à l’épreuve (The fight against terrorism and judicial practices in Tunisia: fair trials put to the test)” is available on the ASF website in French and in Arabic. Created in 2012, the ROJ aims at observing legal practice in criminal trials in order to assess progress in terms of how they respect international standards, and to put forward recommendations for reforming the judicial system.
Tunis, 8 February 2017 – Nine civil society organisations in Tunisia, including ASF, are calling on the temporary Special Committee tasked with examining and sorting applications to the Truth and Dignity Commission (Instance Vérité et Dignité, IVD) to respect the provisions of the transitional justice law with regard to the procedure for appointing IVD members. This is the second appeal made by the monitoring committee following the recommendations of the National congress on transitional justice in November 2016. In the first, on 21 November 2016, the same organisations called on Tunisian members of parliament to take responsibility and appoint new commissioners to the IVD without delay. The Assembly of the Representatives of the People responded with a resolution on 21 December 2016 (Official Gazette of the Republic of Tunisia n°105, 27 December 2016) opening applications for the three unfilled member positions on the IVD. Tunisian justice law outlines the specific provisions and procedures governing the appointment of IVD members. Articles 23 and 22 of the law require, among other things, the list of applications received to be published in the Official Gazette and on the website of the Assembly of Representatives. However, the list of candidates and the procedure for sorting and assessing applications are both yet to be disclosed, and any opposition lodged against applications received and subsequent decisions by the Commission responsible for examining and sorting these have not been made public. As a result, nine national and international civil society organisations are calling on the Commission to ensure that the principles of transparency, neutrality, impartiality and gender proportionality set out in law are respected during the processing of applications. And they say this must happen as soon as possible. >> Read the full text of their message in French and in Arabic.